<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weighing a 747. In an Interview.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lbrandy.com/blog/2008/09/weighing-a-747-in-an-interview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lbrandy.com/blog/2008/09/weighing-a-747-in-an-interview/</link>
	<description>{ on programming and the internets, every monday }</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:14:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://lbrandy.com/blog/2008/09/weighing-a-747-in-an-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-28285</link>
		<dc:creator>T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 10:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lbrandy.com/blog/?p=123#comment-28285</guid>
		<description>Well, think about PSI!
Tire pressure and the tire footprint, as simple as that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, think about PSI!<br />
Tire pressure and the tire footprint, as simple as that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Answerer</title>
		<link>http://lbrandy.com/blog/2008/09/weighing-a-747-in-an-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-26277</link>
		<dc:creator>Answerer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lbrandy.com/blog/?p=123#comment-26277</guid>
		<description>If knowing the mass of the fuel is an acceptable assumption, then why not just assume that you know the mass of the 747 to start with?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If knowing the mass of the fuel is an acceptable assumption, then why not just assume that you know the mass of the 747 to start with?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baby name meaning and origin for Brandy</title>
		<link>http://lbrandy.com/blog/2008/09/weighing-a-747-in-an-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-5202</link>
		<dc:creator>Baby name meaning and origin for Brandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 02:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lbrandy.com/blog/?p=123#comment-5202</guid>
		<description>[...] lbrandy.com &quot; Blog Archive &quot; Weighing a 747. In an Interview. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lbrandy.com &#8221; Blog Archive &#8221; Weighing a 747. In an Interview. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Igo</title>
		<link>http://lbrandy.com/blog/2008/09/weighing-a-747-in-an-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-487</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Igo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lbrandy.com/blog/?p=123#comment-487</guid>
		<description>I see what you&#039;re saying, but to get novel solutions from some candidates, you may have to pose a similar problem without constraints, such as &quot;Tell me all the ways you might determine the weight of a 747.&quot;  One of those would be &quot;scale&quot; and the rest would be the novel solutions you seek.  I think it depends on how people process constraints and whether they accept them at the surface or look for implied meaning.

I used to ask people &quot;Tell me why chocolate fire hydrants are a bad idea,&quot; so that I could see how they thought about engineering, manufacturing, material science, robustness, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see what you&#8217;re saying, but to get novel solutions from some candidates, you may have to pose a similar problem without constraints, such as &#8220;Tell me all the ways you might determine the weight of a 747.&#8221;  One of those would be &#8220;scale&#8221; and the rest would be the novel solutions you seek.  I think it depends on how people process constraints and whether they accept them at the surface or look for implied meaning.</p>
<p>I used to ask people &#8220;Tell me why chocolate fire hydrants are a bad idea,&#8221; so that I could see how they thought about engineering, manufacturing, material science, robustness, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: louis</title>
		<link>http://lbrandy.com/blog/2008/09/weighing-a-747-in-an-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-486</link>
		<dc:creator>louis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lbrandy.com/blog/?p=123#comment-486</guid>
		<description>Well, it&#039;s also that my answer borders on the absurd. I think if an interviewer asked this question he wouldn&#039;t mind it if you embraced the absurdity and attacked the problem in a novel way. Presumably, that&#039;s what he really cares about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s also that my answer borders on the absurd. I think if an interviewer asked this question he wouldn&#8217;t mind it if you embraced the absurdity and attacked the problem in a novel way. Presumably, that&#8217;s what he really cares about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Igo</title>
		<link>http://lbrandy.com/blog/2008/09/weighing-a-747-in-an-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-483</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Igo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lbrandy.com/blog/?p=123#comment-483</guid>
		<description>Hmm, perhaps I see constraints that aren&#039;t there.  To me, a scale means anything you can use to determine mass.  The fact that your scale is in the form of a fuel pump, measuring flow over time, makes it still a scale, since it&#039;s a mass counter.  I think it&#039;s the same reason some people do poorly on true/false tests; they can see unintended angles implied or allowed by wording.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, perhaps I see constraints that aren&#8217;t there.  To me, a scale means anything you can use to determine mass.  The fact that your scale is in the form of a fuel pump, measuring flow over time, makes it still a scale, since it&#8217;s a mass counter.  I think it&#8217;s the same reason some people do poorly on true/false tests; they can see unintended angles implied or allowed by wording.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: louis</title>
		<link>http://lbrandy.com/blog/2008/09/weighing-a-747-in-an-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-481</link>
		<dc:creator>louis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lbrandy.com/blog/?p=123#comment-481</guid>
		<description>Nah, Bob! The fuel pump will tell you how many gallons you pulled. You do need to know or look-up the density of the fuel, though, to figure out the mass. Or, you could just go with an estimate as if it was water, and say 1 m^3 is 1000 kg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah, Bob! The fuel pump will tell you how many gallons you pulled. You do need to know or look-up the density of the fuel, though, to figure out the mass. Or, you could just go with an estimate as if it was water, and say 1 m^3 is 1000 kg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

